Why the Lib Dems are behaving like narcissists*

 

Title has been changed (see below)

While it may be strange link to make, it is an important one. We may believe we are doing the right thing, but so do people who do horrific things. We need to keep ourselves in check.

Narcissists can come across as flashy and neat, with good interpersonal skills, charming glances, with an air of competence, self-assured behaviour and humour, however there is a darker side to these people. The narcissist is fixated on their image and activities are directed toward the enhancement of their image. The result of this is that a narcissist can be ruthless, exploitative, sadistic, or destructive to another person because they are so insensitive to the other’s suffering or feeling. But what characterises a narcissist above all else is the striving for power and control. Someone who feels superior to others needs to have some evidence and this manifests itself in gaining power and control, otherwise known as winning. See here for experts talking about being in a relationship with someone who is narcissistic.

So what has this got to do with the soldiers who act ‘immorally’ e.g. urinating on dead bodies or Abu Ghraib. It is difficult to comprehend why trained professionals would act in such a way but framed in terms of narcissism it can be seen very differently:

The connection between the overriding importance of winning, the denial of feeling, and the role of the image is most evident in warfare. Since victory or defeat is seen as a function largely in terms of life or death, there is no room for feelings. Soldiers function largely in terms of images. However, they retain their humanity by their feelings for a buddy or the squad members with whom they have personal contact. Without these feelings they risk becoming killing machines or going insane. A soldier is not a narcissist, but war forces him to act like one – Dr Lowen from Narcissism.

So the horrific acts make more sense when we see that soldiers act like narcissists, who can be cruel and abusive. The difference between a soldier and a genuine narcissist is that a soldier retains some form of humanity through a connection with his regiment/platoon/ friends. So what has this got to do with the Lib Dems?

Traits of narcissism could be seen in Margaret Thatcher and her demise, which will be remembered through the Poll Tax. Her belief that millionaires should pay the same as low income earners seemed cruel and out of touch yet as she could not empathise with people she failed to see a problem with the tax. Narcissists are often out of touch with reality and as they feel superior to others they feel they are born to lead. To compare a narcissist to healthy development we can see Thatcher’s behaviour more clearly:

Characteristic

Healthy Development

Narcissism

Self-confidence High outward self-confidence in line with reality An unrealistic sense of superiority (“Grandiose”)
Desire for power, wealth and admiration May enjoy power Pursues power at all costs, lacks normal inhibitions in its pursuit
Relationships Real concern for others and their ideas; does not exploit or devalue others Concerns limited to expressing socially appropriate response when convenient; devalues and exploits others without remorse
Ability to follow a consistent path Has values; follows through on plans Lacks values; easily bored; often changes course

The Lib Dems are not Margaret Thatcher but for many the Coalition Government has put forward plans to cut benefits for disabled children and cancer patients and Lib Dems Ministers and the party are seen as supporting it. When it went to the Lords only 5 rebelled (although many abstained). This has caused a depth of feeling similar to other issues such as tuition fees and other benefits caps. A feeling of disregard, unsympathetic and to many cruel. The story (i.e. perception) for many is that the Lib Dems are behaving as narcissists (Thatcher): feeling superior to what they really are, saying anything to gain power, showing no remorse for decisions made which affects people’s lives and a focus on their image rather than on what is good for the country (and them).

The reason why the Lib Dems are more like the soldiers than Thatcher is that the Lib Dems do have sound values and good reason for being in power. We do care about the decisions we make, it is just that in the situation we now find ourselves in, no one can see that. The decisions we are making are horrific to many. We may not be narcissists but being in Coalition is making us act like one. We need to show that we are not.

  • Keep a focus on our values and do not bend them to fit the situation.
  • Show genuine feeling for the people who are affected by the decisions we make.
  • Be prepared to stand up to things that will harm people.
  • Be prepared to take on criticism.
  • Abstaining is not a rebellion. Voting against is. If you want to show that you do not support something, own that decision. Abstaining will not show you care.

* the title has been changed, as the original title has caused offence. I should have realised it would, but I didn’t. I thank those who have left feedback and comments. All feedback, positive and negative, is taken on board.

11 Responses to Why the Lib Dems are behaving like narcissists*

  1. Messy Train Land Blogger says:

    “to cut benefits for disabled children and cancer patients” – a massive over-simplification of the Welfare Reform Bill.

    The argument you’re making is hugely complicated, and yet the supporting facts it relies on are open to doubt (even on a charitable reading of what you’re saying).

    • Hi Messy Train Land Blogger, thank you for the comments and I realise that it is a gross over simplification but that particular line was taken from the BBC website and is pretty much how people understand it and there are some things in this bill which have caused such strong feeling among many. I take your point and the criticism, thank you for commenting.

  2. z says:

    What a load of rubbish.

  3. Gareth Epps says:

    A very interesting piece and one that applies at all levels of the Party (warts ‘n’ all).

  4. It could be argued that your unnecessary and hyperbolic title to get “hits” is in fact a demonstration of narcissism.

    The conclusions you draw effectively justify the behaviour of soldiers and do not assist the Lib Dems in any way. The unnecessary relation to a brutal and immoral act by American soldiers simply undermines the party.

    As I’m sure you are aware, the majority of people read the headline, and it drops in margins. What you have done by posting this article and failing to be coherent on your points is to malign the Lib Dems maliciously and ensure that the majority of people only translate: Lib Dems are to be regarded with visceral distaste and as both immoral and narcissistic.

    • Hi Kelly-Marie, thank you for the comments and I get that it could seem like a headline to gain hits and this in itself could be linked to narcissism. This is not a strategy I have ever taken but I accept the criticism. I was very close to not posting this and on reflection perhaps I should have made my point in a better way. All my life I have struggled with the behaviour of the military until I went to work for them and I gained an insight into how the military works in a way I did not realise. From an outsiders point of view their actions are immoral and brutal. From inside the military this is not the case. The two worlds are different and I am happy to discuss the differences but I am not sure that this is what you intended when you made your comments.

      Some of the feelings evoked by some of the decisions the Lib Dems have signed up to have been extreme. For many I talk to there is such a strong feeling that I sometimes find it hard to see how we will recover our true identity (i.e. one that cares about people). This strong feeling exists in party members, ex-voters and ex-potential voters. I think we need to at least acknowledge the strength of feeling that exists and the dangers that exist of being in Government. So while you are absolutely right that I align the Lib Dems as both immoral and narcissistic, my point is that they aren’t but some of what they do is seen this way by many.

      Even so, I apologise for the way I made my point and I thank you for holding me to account for this.

  5. Gareth Epps says:

    Thing is, Kelly, there are without doubt narcissists in all forms of politics, from the councillors who grandstand and don’t do their casework, to some of the behaviour seen in some Parliamentarians.

    Yes, the title is OTT but the substance is fair comment and food for thought.

  6. Neville Farmer says:

    A staggering piece of ill-informed, ignorant, destructive and “narcissistic” tripe. Kelly-Marie puts it kindly but intelligently. I feel less charitable. There are many things I would criticise LibDems in parliament and government for but to parallel them with an act of such barbarity can only serve to entrench the view that the right wing press are determined to impress upon a gullible public. I guess the one advantage with wearing sandals is you can shoot yourself in the foot without damaging your shoes.

    • Hi Neville, thank you for your comments and I also thank you for putting in the way you did as I am sure you could have said it in much stronger terms as I appreciate how strong you feel about this piece. I have answered much of this in my response to Kelly-Marie but I would just reiterate my appreciation for your feedback.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 545 other followers